“The Vindication of Imputation,” by D. A. Carson, in JUSTIFICATION: WHAT’S AT STAKE IN THE CURRENT DEBATES, edited by Mark Husbands and Daniel J. Treier

Published on February 9, 2021 by Benjamin J. Montoya

IVP Academic, 2004 | 278 pages

A “Bonus” Chapter Summary from Books At a Glance

By Benjamin J. Montoya

 

The Debate on Imputation

The theological topic of “imputation” has received mixed assessments as of late. Imputation refers to our sin being transferred, or imputed, to Christ and his righteousness being counted for, or imputed to, us. It is the language of a “great exchange.” Some scholars still affirm it as absolutely necessary for understanding for anyone professing to be a Christian. Others, however, think that the language is problematic and not found in the NT. What should we think of this topic? Is it biblical? It is good to use this kind of language theologically? The goal of this short article is to focus on elements of this debate on imputation to vindicate the concept.

[To continue reading this summary, please see below....]

The remainder of this article is premium content. Become a member to continue reading.

Already have an account? Sign In

Buy the books

JUSTIFICATION: WHAT'S AT STAKE IN THE CURRENT DEBATES, edited by Mark Husbands and Daniel J. Treier

IVP Academic, 2004 | 278 pages

Share This

Share this with your friends!